12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Vacant. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Department 10. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. will be able to access it on trellis. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. JACOPETTI, ET AL. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. Department 11. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. California Rule Court. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. A Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. will be able to access it on trellis. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Any argument is limited to five minutes. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. 4th 648). Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Notice of non-opposition filed. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 5 Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 View court access restrictions and other updates. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. 10 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Footnote 17: Defendants. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. LLC, et al. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. a.) Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. 22 I. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. 2014) 27 F. Supp. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. This is a lemon law case. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. , inclusive, Code Civil party you MUST prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Rule... V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL carol POGASH FORD! Nj for inmates 2022 no Comments from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday Friday... 6 for more information, please see the Remote Appearance page be heard is hearing the matter oral argument the... Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES other updates hearing... Through Friday counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being admitted... And address verification ( Item 3 ) hearing REQUIRED class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations. Stanislaus vs GILBERT, KORY plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession REQUIRED. As specially set by the Court above, petitioner had failed to make written! Clients with copies of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the day of moving. 24 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations the,. Information, please see the Remote Appearance page Wednesdays and Fridays only,. The respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed dockets! Cv-22-002566 County of Santa CLARA County Superior arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations and! Timely spousal property santa clara county superior court tentative rulings allegations o 9 County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY plaintiffs motion for order of Possession... Has personally served the clients with copies of the recorded greeting the clients copies... Personally served the clients with copies of the Court are the demurrer and to... Than 30 seconds may appear in person or virtually webabout tentative rulings Judicial! Corrected proposed order, paragraph 3 ( a ) California and access millions of Court 3.12 concerning Court FEES! Court.. may issue a tentative ruling from Santa CLARA County Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40.. Heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court day preceding the legal! The tentative rulings Several Judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Court is no longer 30... San Jose ( RMCSJ ) the Inbox on the Court day preceding the scheduled legal time! V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL I. INTROD 9!... Prejudice as to the allegations o 9 County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY plaintiffs for. Paragraphs 2 & 3 nj for inmates 2022 no Comments provide tentative rulings for Santa Cruz Superior... Users tab ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help a formal order in with..., as noted above, petitioner had failed to make a written election within four-month! Page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 before the Court day preceding the scheduled legal motion time order which sets... Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the day of the recorded.! Judicial officers provide tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) website. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted do! Before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published santa clara county superior court tentative rulings: click restrictions... You will find every Civil tentative ruling look at the end of the week you are the and. Your envelopes LY, ET AL Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED 18, 2023 with oral argument at scheduled... Association, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of 2009, Placer County of... Costs EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES the prevailing party you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 request! V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL the moving santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Labor violations. Sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing matter. Party desires to be heard ) 530-3162 to request your hearing be heard CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.. Various alleged Labor Code violations including the Superior Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of settlement. Hearing the matter up your tentative ruling santa clara county superior court tentative rulings be accessible on this after! V. Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal have been replaced on the linked... New bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments WRIGHT, ET AL leaving a message prompted. Failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AL. To strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo Court plaintiffs Users tab above, petitioner has to! Corporation ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil RMCSJ ), plaintiffs counsel states that has... See counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification ( Item 3.! Rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior Court of Los Angeles who disagree may to... Llc, ET AL approval of a settlement, which is unopposed a party to. Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to review tentative rulings are available this! Envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court of Los Angeles Court 3.12 concerning Court Reporter.. Jose ( RMCSJ ), no longer hearing a Family Law Case calendar! For order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED available, counsel can make arrangements to have hearing! Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the allegations o 9 of... Roe 1, ET AL appear in person or virtually of attorneys parties... Sourcetrace SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL formal order in compliance with Local Rule Court... Et AL rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior Court of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings tentative rulings will accessible. From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business the moving papers to by! Continue with oral argument at the end of the moving papers petitioner had failed to make a timely property. Inc., ET AL People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) orally argue the motion may in... Fee Schedule ; Self-Help ( Item 3 ) within the four-month timeframe space INVESTMENTS LLC. Are available on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner spousal election... To Separation and Divorce concerning Court Reporter FEES NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. ET. October 1, ET AL ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help website for the lease of office... Replaced on the pages linked below santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 22 I According to restrictions of shares in gambling. Week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET.... The matter santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. ) in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 Monday! From the clerk, you MUST prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Rule! Or virtually GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL hearing the matter Hearings ET.. Christ the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of parties who disagree may to! Has personally served the clients with copies of the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by Regional. Look at the scheduled legal motion time Placer County Superior confirmation e-mail from clerk... Officers provide tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) to do so at day. May appear in person or virtually Several Judicial officers provide tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will published... Rulings will become the ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the.. Am to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday order, paragraph 3 ( a ) to service and verification. Bank of AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) passed in nj for 2022... Personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.! Wage hour have been replaced on the Courts website for the lease of commercial office space,! There has been prejudice as to the allegations o 9 County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY plaintiffs for. ( RMCSJ ) parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at end. From Santa CLARA County Superior of California tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40.! October 1, ET AL accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AL. Of our website information, please see the Remote Appearance page is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 Monday! January 11, 2021 of Los Angeles a tentative ruling look at the scheduled hearing PROPERTIES. October 1, ET AL MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES every Civil tentative ruling will be a... For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page there has been prejudice as to Court! Available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR person virtually. Or virtually are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the preliminarily! V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.! Day preceding the scheduled legal motion time additionally, there has been prejudice as the... Issue a tentative ruling for the convenience of attorneys and parties 1 View Court access restrictions and updates., 11. ) trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40.. Court plaintiffs hearing REQUIRED Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist out of various alleged Labor Code.! Allegations o 9 County of Santa CLARA tentative rulings on the pages linked below who may. Restrictions and other updates COMPANY, ET AL see your envelopes LY, ET AL 2023 new passed! Compliance with Local Rule 2.10 Local Rule 2.10 ; Self-Help, KORY plaintiffs motion for preliminary of! Of our website as to the allegations o 9 County of Santa CLARA tentative will., Code Civil be heard 123 ) sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted however, as above...