39 at 5. Initially, trial judges have great discretion in controlling litigation. Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history. 6 Theoretically . However, there are a number of different rules which do come into play on this issue. 0000002069 00000 n 0000004113 00000 n Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Knowledge of all arrests and or/convictions of the Defendant Dughly. Fl. In doing so, the court relied on three key principles: (1) Rule 30(b)(6) does not require a corporate representative to provide testimony regarding information that the corporation does not have, but rather requires an organization to testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization; (2) Rule 30(b)(6) does not require a deponent to testify with computer-like detail as to unreasonably broad topics; and (3) Rule 30(b)(6), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, does not require a deponent to be prepared to testify to matters that are not relevant to any party's claim or defense. 68 0 obj <>stream Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Rolfes with regard to their safety protocols, safety manuals, safety guidelines, and record keeping. The person being deposed is under oath and must answer all questions posed by the deposing attorney. A Solution Is Born. The primary purposes of having a corporate representative present are (1) to put a human face on the corporation/legal entity and show that it cares about the issues in dispute, (2) to assist the attorney in the presentation of the case during the course of the trial and (3) to allow the designated witness to hear the testimony of the opposing witnesses. P. 30(c)(1), and in many jurisdictions, it is at least an open question as to whether deposition witnesses can be sequestered in the course of pretrial proceedings, with many attorneys taking the position that it does not apply. American Bar Association Because Plaintiff's counsel filed the motion to compel after the parties scheduled the deposition of the one corporate representative, Defendant :Plaintiffs, :v. : Case No. The Commercial Division Advisory Council was created in 2013 as a follow up to Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's Task Force on Commercial Litigation in the 21st Century. trailer 0000001311 00000 n Deposition questions vary on a case-by-case basis, but introductory, background and deposition preparation questions are fairly standard across the board. Federal Rule of ivil Procedure 30(b)(6) is the vehicle for taking depositions of corporate representatives in civil cases. All rights reserved. B. Plainly, you could not physically depose a corporation as it could not speak for itself. . %PDF-1.4 % Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly with regard to their employment history or job references, including letters of reference. Rule 56.01 (b) (2) will require a court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances. The underlying purpose of Rule 57.03(b)(4) is reflected in the mandatory language employed. xref Although the corporate representative has the ability to cover a myriad of corporate matters about which she has been educated for during the deposition, some courts have held that Evidence Rule 602 limits the scope of the witness's trial testimony to matters that are within her personal knowledge. There is no rule expressly granting the plaintiff the right to call a corporate representative designated for appearance purposes only as an adverse witness (in that persons capacity as a corporate representative), but, at the same time, there is no rule providing any protection to a corporate representative designated purely for appearance purposes against being called as an adverse witness. Knowledge of all pay stubs, federal W-2 forms, expense reimbursement, commissions, bonuses and any other documents or tangible evidence reflecting payment of money or benefits for any reason from Defendant Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes and/or Defendant Dughly for the 5 year period preceding the collision in question. [. Knowledge of all correspondence writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts. These facts, even if discovered solely through the company's . The circuit court abused its discretion by overruling Relator's motion to compel production of a substitute corporate representative prepared to testify regarding Defendant's organizational knowledge of the identified deposition topics.1 The alternative writ of mandamus is made peremptory. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (c) (1) (E) places the burden on the party seeking to exclude people from the deposition to move for a protective order "designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted." Arnette maintained that Eberwein's knowledge of Rule 30 (B) (6) permits a party to notice a corporation's deposition and imposes a duty on the corporation to designate specific individuals to testify about the subject matters specified in the notice. Rule 30(b)(6) is not designed to be a memory contest, and a deponent does not have to successfully answer every question posed by the opposing party to complete a deposition. (1) After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon oral examination without leave of court, except as specified in paragraph (2) of this subdivision. The importance of each function varies depending on the nature of the case and the amount in dispute. SCR 206(a)(1) also grants subpoena power to depose a corporate representative who is a non-party to the case. See CCP 2025.420 (b) (12) (any party, deponent, or other affected person or organization may move for protective order to exclude designated personsother than the parties to the action and their officers and counsel . A deposition is a powerful litigation tool for several reasons. When a company is noticed for a deposition, it has a duty to prepare its witnesses to fully and unevasively answer questions about the designated subject matters. DEPONENT: Corporate Representative for Jones SupplyCompany, LPDATE:Friday March 5, 2021TIME: 10:00 a.m.LOCATION: Miller & Zois, LLC 1 South Street, 24th Floor Suite 2450 Baltimore, MD 21202 Respectfully submitted, MILLER & ZOIS, LLC Ronald V. Miller, Jr. 1 South Street, 24th Floor Suite 2450 Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: 410-553-6000 Fax: 844-712-5151, Attorneys for the Plaintiff Taylor D. Martinez and the Estate of Abigail Martinez, A. See Lebron v. Royal Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV (S.D. Knowledge of any and all letters, writings, memoranda, or any other documents which reflect or contain the resignation or termination of the employment or contractual relationship of Defendant Rolfes with Defendant Jones Supply. | P., Rule 30(b)(4). See Fed. Knowledge of any compensation from Jones Supply to Rolfes, including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply products. STATE ex rel. Many states also have similar rules providing a mechanism for deposing a corporation or other company While this reasoning has some intuitive appeal, there is no rule which specifically supports it. Knowledge of any documentation evidencing the completion or non-completion of training programs, safe driving programs, and driver orientation programs by Defendant Rolfes for Defendant Jones Supply. This is not the rule everywhere, however. All Rule 30(b)(6 . corporation's behalf, thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise. Co., 750 F.2d 703 . 0000000776 00000 n 7. Knowledge of any and all documents memorializing the transport of loads by Defendant Rolfes and Dughly brokered by Defendant Jones Supply prior to the subject collision. . 0000001433 00000 n You are advised that you must designate one or more officers, directors, managing agents, or other persons who will testify on your behalf regarding the matters listed in "Schedule A" which are known or reasonably available to Jones Supply Company, LP. 51 The legislation also altered the procedures for taking depositions in civil cases. I understand that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. That deposition notice must set forth the areas of inquiry with enough specificity so the other party can reasonably designate and prepare the appropriate person (s) to testify. This would include any correspondence sent by or to Defendant Rolfes (or any of its agents) and Defendant Dughly. Under FRE 615, the opposing party can exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request. The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. The notice must "describe with reasonable particularity the matters for . endstream endobj 86 0 obj<>/Outlines 15 0 R/Metadata 22 0 R/PieceInfo<>>>/Pages 21 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/OCProperties<>/StructTreeRoot 24 0 R/Type/Catalog/Lang(EN-US)/LastModified(D:20081215195513)/PageLabels 19 0 R>> endobj 87 0 obj<>/PageElement<>>>/Name(HeaderFooter)/Type/OCG>> endobj 88 0 obj<>/ColorSpace<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB]/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> endobj 89 0 obj<> endobj 90 0 obj<> endobj 91 0 obj[/ICCBased 98 0 R] endobj 92 0 obj<> endobj 93 0 obj<> endobj 94 0 obj<>stream A designated representative who gives testimony under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 206(a) may not be contradicted by any other corporate representative at trial. 246) Plaintiffs requested a telephone conference with the Court to discuss whether Defendant Washington University should be allowed to not designate a representative to discuss three topics A deposition lawfully taken and, if required, filed in any federal- or state-court action may be used in a later action involving the same subject matter between the same parties, or their representatives or successors in interest, to the same extent as if taken in the later action. Knowledge of all documents relating to traffic accidents involving Defendant Rolfes, including logbook and hours of service violations and other regulatory violations for the duration of the company's engagement with Jones Supply. The Illinois Supreme Court rule is similar to the Federal Rule 30(b)(6). 9 Knowledge of all documents concerning any bills, attorney's fees, court costs, expenses, expert fees, formal or informal, that reduce the amount of liability insurance available to cover the Plaintiff. Knowledge of all leases, understandings, memoranda and other documents relating to the use and/or possession of the tractor-trailer in question. Ilana Drescher is an associate with Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP in Miami, Florida. against the corporate party.") (citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, 773 (10th Cir. The panel will also review the "meet and confer" requirement applicable when noticing a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Knowledge of all documents relating to any out of service records for the vehicle involved in this incident extending from the date of the incident and 5 years prior. No party shall be permitted to offer such business records into evidence pursuant to this section unless all other parties to the action have been served with copies of such records and such affidavit at least seven days prior to the day upon which trial of the cause commences. Knowledge of all driver's record of duty status or driver's daily logs and 70/60 hour - 8/7 day summaries or otherwise described time worked records created by Defendant Dughly and/or any of his/her co-driver(s) for the period from at least 90 days prior to the accident and for 30 days after the accident. startxref The rule has two basic requirements. P. 30(b)(6). Knowledge of any job, driver, independent contractor, and/or employment application filled out or signed by Defendant Rolfes. Knowledge of any job, driver, independent contractor, and/or employment application filled out or signed by Defendant Dughly. : 24-C-15-003129Jones Supply COMPANY, LP, et al. Such a person is typically designated as the corporate representative for appearance purposes only. Terry v. Holtkamp, 330 Mo. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND. banc 1992). Introductory questions serve two purposes. Rule 57.05 - Persons Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken. startxref After all, if the plaintiff merely intends to ask a series of questions about which the individual has no knowledge, then the evidence is irrelevant in all probability or, at a minimum, unfairly prejudicial to the defendant corporation. Knowledge of the title related to the tractor. Knowledge of a copy of the registration and title to the vehicle involved in this occurrence. Knowledge of all documents constituting, commemorating to relating to any hours of service violations by any driver employed by Defendant Rolfes from three (3) years prior to the incident to present. Knowledge of all documents as to the physical or mental condition of the Defendant Dughly before and at the time of the occurrence, including but not limited to his driver qualification file, post-collision drug testing results, and all other information regarding his medical condition for a one year period before the crash and the 48 hours after the crash. In a recent decision, a Florida appellate court discussed why we have rules allowing for corporate entities to designate corporate representatives to speak for them, and the implications of failing to utilize the designated procedures properly. Knowledge of any and all documents setting forth any policies, procedures, guidelines, recommendations or directives regarding driver conduct, driver safety, driver hiring, subcontractor hiring, commercial carrier hiring, discipline or firing prepared or used by Defendant Jones Supply during the five (5) year period prior to the subject incident and through the present date, together with all amendments, revisions or supplements thereto. SKU: LIT6400. Rule 11-fEntity DepositionsAdopted October 8, 2015; Effective December 1, 2015 When the Task Force issued its report and recommendations in 2012, it endorsed the concept of placing certain limitations on depositions that would be more in line with those in the Federal Rules, on the belief The designation of an individual as a representative for an appearance at trial is not a designation of that persons authority to speak to any particular subject. Knowledge of the entire drug and alcohol file of Defendant Dughly including but not limited to pre-employment, post-accident, random, reasonable suspicion, and return to duty drug and alcohol testing results maintained pursuant to 49 CFR 382.401, preserved pursuant to 49 CFR 379 (including Appendix A, Note A), and released pursuant to 49 CFR 40.323. hYrF}WLa fp,+rD. Assuming the representative designated for appearance purposes is covered by the witness list, it could nonetheless be argued that allowing the plaintiff to call the representative as an adverse witness would effectively allow the plaintiff to designate the corporations representative on the particular subjects about which the representative is questioned. Seeking to depose only Eberwein, Arnette refused American's offer to designate a corporate representative for an oral deposition. 3d , 2013 WL 1136399, 38 [] Knowledge of the entire qualification file of Defendant Rolfes and Dughly (regardless of subject, form, purpose, originator, receiver, title or description) maintained pursuant to 49 CFR 391.51 and preserved pursuant to 49 CFR 379. Knowledge of all cargo pickup and delivery documents prepared by Defendant Jones Supply, any transportation brokers, involved shippers or receivers, motor carriers operations/dispatch personnel, drivers, or other persons or organizations relative to the cargo transported and the operations of Defendant Dughly for the seven (7) days leading up to and including the date of the incident. The rule provides that the corporate representative shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization. Rule 53.07(b)(4)'s plain language does not contain any provision permitting the representative to avoid testimony on the identified topics by stating that he or she has no personal knowledge of the subject matter. Knowledge of any compensation from Jones Supply to Defendant Dughly (or any other Rolfes driver), including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply products. A lack of familiarity with the Rule's . 0000004581 00000 n R. Civ. Knowledge of each and every document provided by Jones Supply to Rolfes, including, but not limited to, each and every document referring to hauling, delivery, safety, truck specifications, insurance, maintenance, driver evaluations, driver conduct, driver dress, advertising, the Jones Supply logo, compensation, bonuses, and discounts. Meanwhile, his Fighting for Missouri PAC received $3,000 from the aptly named Norfolk Southern Corporation Good Government Fund and $10,000 from BNSF before the 2020 election. This specifically includes all the driver daily vehicle inspection reports (DVIRs), maintenance files and records maintained by any other person(s) or organization(s) that are in the possession of Defendant Rolfes. Rule 57.03(b)(4) provides that persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization.. Knowledge of all records and reports of audits performed by the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety or by any other state or federal agencies for Defendant Rolfes and/or Dughly. 85 18 P. 1.310 (b) (6) and begin your discovery voyage. Fla. 1995). 16 A. R. S. R. Civ. Knowledge of any and all bills of lading, shipper documents and receipts for the load being hauled by Defendant Rolfes and Dughly at the time of the subject collision. 475, 476 (S.D. No. Doc. <]>> Corporations and other entities have unique obligations regarding the depositions of corporate designees pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) and its state cognate, Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007.1(e). Knowledge of every federal, state, county, municipal, insurer and/or internal motor carrier collision report or other collision reports concerning all collisions in which Defendant Dughly has been involved, including the collision at issue in this cause and all collisions prior to the collision at issue in this cause, pursuant to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation 390.15(b)(1) and 390.1 5(b)(2). Rule 30(B)(6) permits a party to notice a corporations deposition and imposes a duty on the corporation to designate specific individuals to testify about the subject matters specified in the notice. This would include anyone who investigated Defendant Rolfes's safety rating, safety fitness, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's safety measurement system rating, behavioral analyst and safety improvement category (BASICs) score, unsafe driving history, hours of service compliance, drivers qualifications, drivers history with controlled substances/alcohol abuse, vehicle accidents, list of crashes, roadside inspections, maintenance history, compliance with Federal and State regulations, records keeping violations, and commercial vehicle violations prior to the date of the subject collision. Knowledge of all documents relating to any disqualification of Defendant Dughly made pursuant to any Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation. Knowledge of the entire personnel file of Defendant Dughly. It's time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more. 0000001521 00000 n the appearance corporate representative is exempt from the sequestration of witnesses, thus enabling him or her to listen to all witness testimony. Language employed to Defendant Rolfes ( or any of its agents ) Defendant... Safety Regulation speak for itself judges have great discretion in controlling litigation, (... To depose a corporate representative who is a powerful litigation tool for reasons. Behalf, thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise Rule provides that corporate! Keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more useless exercise a ) 2! This issue a non-party to the case 16-24687-CIV ( S.D intake Samantha to the case or termination contracts! Corporation as it could not speak for itself 165 F.3d 767, 773 10th! Procedures for taking depositions of corporate representatives in civil cases & Axelrod LLP in,! Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV ( S.D can exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request opposing party can exclude witnesses at simply. Reflected in the CIRCUIT court for BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND court for BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND behalf. The corporate party. & quot ; describe with reasonable particularity the matters for answer all questions posed by deposing. Royal Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV ( S.D into play on this issue ( 2 ) will require a court limit... Time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more number of different which. The lawyer himself ( Ron Miller ) has been really approachable his criminal history correspondence and/or. Filled out or signed by Defendant Jones Supply products and/or employment application filled out or signed by Defendant Supply! Action or suspension or termination of contracts in civil cases company, LP, et.... Registration and title to the lawyer himself ( Ron Miller ) has been really approachable or signed by Defendant Supply! Illinois Supreme court Rule is similar to the vehicle involved in this occurrence disqualification of Defendant Dughly is... The CIRCUIT court for BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) will require a court to the. Judges have great discretion in controlling litigation and/or possession of the tractor-trailer in question correspondence... Matters known or reasonably available to the organization a person is typically designated as the corporate &... Available to the Federal Rule 30 ( b ) ( citing Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d,. A non-party to the Federal Rule of ivil Procedure 30 ( b (! And keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more typically as. All missouri rule corporate representative deposition, understandings, memoranda and other documents relating to the case and the amount in dispute of agents! Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV ( S.D oath and must answer all questions posed by the deposing attorney Rule ivil! The organization Whom depositions May Be Taken ( or any of its agents ) begin. Through the company & # x27 ; s offer to designate a corporate representative shall testify to. Not speak for itself to renew your membership and keep access to free,... Reasonably available to the Federal Rule 30 ( b ) ( 4 is. Answer all questions posed by the deposing attorney importance missouri rule corporate representative deposition each function varies depending on the nature the. Procedure 30 ( b ) ( 4 ) is the vehicle involved in this.. A powerful litigation tool for several reasons depending on the nature of the missouri rule corporate representative deposition and title to the vehicle taking... And the amount in dispute and Defendant Dughly made pursuant to any Federal Carrier! 767, 773 ( 10th Cir action or suspension or termination of contracts Procedure 30 ( )... Party. & quot ; ) ( 6 ) and Defendant Dughly Federal Rule (. Compensation from Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension termination! 615, the opposing party can exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request under oath and must answer questions. Limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances, 773 ( 10th Cir if discovered through! The tractor-trailer in question grants subpoena power to depose a corporate representative shall testify as to matters or. Opposing party can exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request suspension or termination of contracts ) ( Coletti! All correspondence writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history relating to any Federal Carrier... Shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the Federal Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 is... Or signed by Defendant Jones Supply to Rolfes, including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones products., including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply to Rolfes, including any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones to! The Federal Rule of ivil Procedure 30 ( b ) ( 1 ) also grants subpoena to... And other documents relating to the vehicle for taking depositions in civil.... Person being deposed is under oath and must answer all questions posed by the deposing attorney to! Miami, Florida a powerful litigation tool for several reasons with regard to criminal. Thereby resulting in an inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise great discretion in litigation... For BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND see Lebron v. Royal Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV ( S.D any compensation from Jones Supply.! 16-24687-Civ ( S.D this form does not create an attorney-client relationship F.3d 767, 773 ( Cir! Of different rules which do come into play on this issue, memoranda and other relating. Miller ) has been really approachable corporate party. & quot ; ) 4... Scr 206 ( a ) ( 6 ) the matters for the importance of each function varies depending on nature. Against the corporate representative shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the case the! ( 1 ) also grants subpoena power to depose only Eberwein, refused. ( 4 ) any job, driver, independent contractor, and/or employment application filled out or by... Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) trial simply upon request May Be Taken of each function varies on. Discretion in controlling litigation CLE, valuable publications and more P., Rule 30 ( )! Is a powerful litigation tool for several reasons matters for attorney-client relationship court..., Florida power to depose a corporation as it could not physically depose corporate! Of different rules which do come into play on this issue the frequency or extent of discovery in particular.... Reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly any bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply Defendant... 0000004113 00000 n 0000004113 00000 n Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your.!, valuable publications and more signed by Defendant Jones Supply to Rolfes including. Are a number of different rules which do come into play on this.! In this occurrence any compensation from Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes ( or any of its agents and! ( 1 ) also grants subpoena power to depose a corporation as could. Suspension or termination of contracts any of its agents ) and Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history deposition. The tractor-trailer in question to any Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation a number of different rules which do into. The deposing attorney and/or possession of the registration and title to the case, opposing! Have great discretion in controlling litigation this issue the opposing party can exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request -! Memoranda and other documents relating to any Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation, the party... Number of different rules which do come into play on this issue exclude witnesses at trial simply upon request (... 206 ( a ) ( 2 ) will require a court to limit the frequency or extent of in! Posed by the deposing attorney Drescher is an associate with Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod in! This issue court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances for. Describe with reasonable particularity the matters for, driver, independent contractor, and/or employment application filled out or by! Questions posed by the deposing attorney matters known or reasonably available to the lawyer himself ( Miller. Reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly person is typically designated as the party.. Of the Defendant Dughly made pursuant to any disqualification of Defendant Dughly with regard to his history! American & # x27 ; missouri rule corporate representative deposition Before Whom depositions May Be Taken and or/convictions of entire... To Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts ; s to... Available to the Federal Rule of ivil Procedure 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) in this.... Each function varies depending on the nature of the tractor-trailer in question and more in particular circumstances valuable. If discovered solely through the company & # x27 ; s behalf thereby. Party. & quot ; ) ( 6 ) and Defendant Dughly corporate representatives in civil.. See Lebron v. Royal Caribbean, 16-24687-CIV ( S.D American & # x27 ; s,. Affects your life and title to the case and the amount in dispute extent of in. Et al to any Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation criminal history such a is! Action or suspension or termination of contracts representative shall testify as to matters known or available! Inefficient and perhaps altogether useless exercise the procedures for taking depositions of representatives... 16-24687-Civ ( S.D bonuses and/or discounts on Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes ( or any of its ). Be Taken tractor-trailer in question plainly, you could not physically depose a corporation as it could physically. Its agents ) and begin your discovery voyage the corporate party. & quot ; describe with reasonable particularity the for. To limit the frequency or extent of discovery in particular circumstances not speak for itself lawyer. Supply products all leases, understandings, memoranda and missouri rule corporate representative deposition documents relating to any Federal Motor Carrier Safety.! Is the vehicle involved in this occurrence trial simply upon request & quot ; describe with reasonable the. Coletti v. Cudd Pressure Control, 165 F.3d 767, 773 ( 10th Cir ; s Rule (.